Review: The North Face FUTURELIGHT

Review: The North Face FUTURELIGHT

The North Face launched FUTURELIGHT in January 2019. It’s the most advanced breathable and waterproof technology for outdoor clothing worldwide. A textile that will turn the current market for waterproof and breathable fabrics upside down. A hefty claim. But is it really the future or is FUTURELIGHT just a marketing hype? During my first meeting at the ISPO I am healthily critical. I have been around for a while and have seen a lot of ‘innovations’ come by. I’m curious. There are some jackets in the booth and an ingenious arrangement in which they show how FUTURELIGHT keeps the water out and lets the air out.



To raise the bar of breathable and waterproof textiles, The North Face borrowed a production process that was developed by science earlier this century and is already used in electronics and the medical world: nanospinning. In the nanospinning process, a polyurethane solution is sprayed from over 200,000 nozzles onto a surface. The solution is then collected in a random manner to turn it into a membrane. This material is then used to create a breathable and waterproof film that is applied to the front and back of the garments. This way you create a nano fiber that is small enough to allow air to flow through the membrane but still keep water out. Or in plain English: lots of little holes that allow the textile to breathe and leave water out.

According to The North Face, an additional advantage of this production process is adaptability. With the help of nanospinning the weight, the stretch, the breathability and even the durability can be adjusted. “For the past couple decades, we have worn apparel we need to adapt to. Now, we have apparel that adapts to us.” That is not just a claim.

FUTURELIGHT under a huge magnifying glass
FUTURELIGHT under a huge magnifying glass

Light and super soft: but also sustainable?

What you do not see on the above ISPO photos is how light and thin the material is. Where GoreTex and other hardshell jackets are often somewhat stiff, FUTURELIGHT is wonderfully soft. During the ISPO I put on a jacket and I am a bit shocked by it. It feels incredibly light and soft, but it also feels vulnerable. Would I dare to spend hundreds of euros for this?

In the conversation I then have, there is some confusion about durability and sustainability. According to The North Face, this is the most sustainable textile ever used by The North Face. It consists of 90% recycled material and has a Non PFC DWR treatment. Or a water-resistant coating that is a lot less bad for humans, animals and its environment (read more about the risks of PFC DWR). Recycled and fewer chemicals sounds good, of course, but if that means that a jacket lasts substantially less, production can be more sustainable, but buying a new jacket every year is certainly not. Hence the confusion about durability and sustainability.

The proof of the pudding is in the eating

In the spring of 2019 I receive a phone call asking if I want to come and test FUTURELIGHT in an extreme environment. Destination: Svalbard. In May when the day lasts almost 24 hours with a boat around the island, moor it off the coast, go ashore with a small rubber boat, hike up and ride down. Halfway through May I pack my winter gear for the last time. Before departure I compensate the CO2 emissions of my flight from Amsterdam via Oslo to Longyearbyen by transferring some money to trees for all.

Ready to go
Ready to go

Four seasons in one trip

On departure the weather is pretty good in large parts of Europe, but when landing in Svalbard it becomes clear what we are dealing with. An active storm is located south of Svalbard and will determine the weather in the coming days. Big waves at sea, wet and later also cold snow, from mild to very cold, from none to a strong wind, from cloudy to plenty of sun. I would say ideal for testing, but a challenge for the guides and also for us.

The storm
The storm

During the trip I get a FUTURELIGHT test set in yellow-black. I look a bit like Big Bird. All those days I wear a Summit L5 jacket and a Summit L5 LT pants. The Summit Series are slightly thinner, but in addition there are also the Steep Series made of a somewhat thicker and heavier FUTURELIGHT version. I did not test this, but some other people did.

(c) Mathis Dumas
© Mathis Dumas

FUTURELIGHT: my review

  • What is immediately noticeable is how light the jacket and pants are. FUTURELIGHT weighs nothing, is elastic and is the most comfortable shell I have ever worn. Only after the first day did I realize how nice that was. In the beginning I missed everything. I missed the stiff collar, the sanding the jacket and the weight. I lacked the feeling of wearing and felt a bit naked. After an hour you soon notice that you can do without all this and that there is such a thing as being comfortable in the backcountry.
  • Secondly, I was concerned about the insulation. Especially during the start of the second and third day it was freezing cold. Because the jacket is so light you have the feeling of not wearing anything. Don’t I get too cold?
  • Which brings me directly to point three: the lack of pit zips. Where outdoor jackets have been fitted with these zippers during the last decades, none can be found here. Yet I have never missed the zippers. FUTURELIGHT appears to have an enormous temperature range. In warm weather I did not have to open my coat immediately because it was too hot or switch to an extra layer in cold weather. Although, it still helps to put on a down jacket under your jacket to defy the wind at the top.
  • Finally, I unconsciously put a crampon of my splitboard in my pants a few times. Where the stiff laminate of my normal trousers does not generally survive this, the elasticity of FUTURELIGHT ensured that the textile could move and did not tear immediately. That gave me a good feeling. The jacket of one of the TNF athletes present gave me an even better feeling. A full season of climbing, touring, treeruns, backpack on and backpack off. The textile looked used, but certainly not worn. The branches had caused stripes on his jacket, but no significant tears as a result.
  • Last but not least the iPhone test. You know what I’m talking about. You have your iPhone in your pocket to quickly access it for a photo or because of a message coming in. That last part wasn’t a problem in Svalbard. No disturbing vibrating function, no overactive app conversations and no companions staring around you at the screen in FUTURELIGHT. But all this cannot be attributed to FUTURELIGHT. Anyone who goes into the backcountry on Svalbard is quickly cut off from any mobile connection. Same on the boat during breakfast in the morning. But photos are possible of course. A little phone nowadays has such a great camera function that I leave my large camera at home more often. But those who go on intensive touring and sweat heavily will immediately see the consequences of poorly breathing clothing on their screen. First you have to dry your screen about10 times before you can take a picture.

I have already had the opportunity to test a lot and dare to state that this is the best thing I’ve worn so far in such conditions.

I am not going to say that FUTURELIGHT is perfect, but it is impressive. I deliberately kept my shell on and kept the zipper of the jacket and chest pocket closed. Also with FUTURELIGHT moisture will appear on the screen of your iPhone, but the difference is huge and immediately visible. In advertisements and conversations about ‘breathable and waterproof’, it is mostly about the water column and the amount of air that the textile lets through. They are then expressed in numbers and you have to get a sense of what this means. In practice, it often turns out differently than I thought. The lack of breathability in particular is killing. You may have a phenomenal water column, but on a wet day you get wet with your own sweat. I have already had the opportunity to test a lot and dare to state that this is the best thing I have worn so far in such conditions.

A risky step forward?

It is brave what The North Face is doing. Investing millions, releasing the old and trusted GoreTex and stepping out of the existing textile chain is one, but also presenting a product for a target group that values sustainability and reliability in the most extreme circumstances is two. I suspect that if you feel FUTURELIGHT in your hands for the first time and then compare it to a conventional hardshell, you are more likely to choose the latter. It feels more familiar and gives you more ‘weight of jacket’ for your money. But remember that first time you ignored the all-you-can-eat restaurant and fast food for that dinner at that fantastic restaurant. It takes some getting used to, especially when there’s less food on your plate, but the taste sensation that followed was intense and even more nutritious.

FUTURELIGHT, the future is bright?

Lighter, better breathable, more durable and waterproof. But you’ll probably still sweat. Even with its impressive specifications, FUTURELIGHT cannot expel all sweat from the skin during extreme exertion. But it is clear to me that TNF has now raised the bar considerably. At the moment there is nothing comparable on the market and they see it as a step towards better. It is the first fulfillment of their dream to make a jacket that you never have to take off. And it must be said: they succeeded.

(c)Mathis Dumas
©Mathis Dumas

Specs for the freaks

FUTURELIGHT becomes available in five different weights of the membrane. This allows them to “adjust” the breathability of a jacket (or glove or tent) to the goal. For example, the Steep Series is many times thicker than Flight Series. 90% of the production consists of the reuse of existing materials, they add a PFC-free DWR treatment to make the water run away from the textile more easily. Textiles with a slightly white color and 85% air. According to The North Face, FUTURELIGHT has a moisture transmission speed (MVTR) of 75,000 g/m²/day. For comparison: the highly breathable eVent material has a maximum MVTR of 30,000 g/m²/day. But what is really amazing is how well the material breathes. FUTURELIGHT also provides an air flow of 1.5 ft³/minute. For comparison, the most breathable fabric has a permeability of 0.2 ft³/min, and many waterproof breathable fabrics are even lower, in the range of 0.07 to 0.09 ft³/min. And that is precisely where FUTURELIGHT stands out: a textile that can still breathe on humid days.

Word of advice

The first FUTURELIGHT jackets and pants are now in the store. If you go freeriding and touring a lot, take a good look at all the jackets and pants from the Steep Series. If you want something lighter then the L5 jacket from the Summit Series is definitely recommended and also more than thick enough.

I would not choose the LT jacket and trousers, it was too thin and at high speed things started to flap quite a bit. In addition, I found the L5 pants a bit narrow at the bottom of the leg and a bit tight to fit a ski boot or snowboard boot. But it fits perfectly for a dedicated touring boot. If you buy a set, share your experiences below so that we get a good impression and you do not only have to believe my blue eyes.



StorpotatisenAuthor16 October 2019 · 15:19

Thanks for the review Morris.
I’m curious about your statement “there is nothing comparable on the market” in regards to the breathability. Have you also tried a Polartec Neoshell jacket, and come to the conclusion that Futurlight is far better?
I haven’t tried any of these materials but I’m really eager to get my hands on a really breathable jacket for those spring days. Hence my question.

meteomorrisAuthor16 October 2019 · 17:37

@@Storpotatisen yes I did. In terms of breathability it felt like Neoshell can compete with FUTURELIGHT although I didn’t do any lab tests on this.
But FUTURELIGHT is better in keeping the moisture outside my jacket. That’s why I concluded “there is nothing comparable on the market”.
When your watercolumn is not able to keep the moisture out on very wet days than breathability won’t help you either. It is the combo of these two that will help you through a solid powder day (and the smile of course ;)).
StorpotatisenAuthor17 October 2019 · 08:17

@@meteomorris. I’ll be smiling on any solid powderday I can get my hands om, soaking wet or not … But I sure would prefer being as dry as possible!! ?
Thanks again!

meteomorrisAuthor17 October 2019 · 15:21

@@Storpotatisen you’re welcome!
crashedagainAuthor29 October 2019 · 03:17

I read your review and though you might be interested in the results of the tests I did on a Futurelight garment. It can be read here:

Neoshell, slightly better breathability. Futurelight, somewhat better water resistance. As far as I am concerned, the differences in air permeability are of no significance.

neilukAuthor29 October 2019 · 17:43

I have found dermizax nx to be the most breathable material for jackets, whilst also being fully waterproof.

I would be interested to see a comparison with Futurelight for jackets.

I find Norrona Lofoten pants to be unbeatable for snowboarders due to the hard wearing materials used.

Dermizax NX is used by Bergans and Kjus ( and Schoffel use it for a very well priced, very breathable summer hiking jacket, the calgary2 )

crashedagainAuthor30 October 2019 · 17:48

I would like to test a dermizax nz but I haven’t found any garments sold in the US. If anyone is aware of US retailers, let me know.

neilukAuthor30 October 2019 · 18:02 have some dermizax nx jackets…

Kjus frx are dermizax nx for example

Bergans ISOGAISA that are the later version, looking like this are dermizax nx. For example


Or this search throws up some other options…just a search for dermizax nx within description. Just be careful, some jackets are insulated which may impact results I guess.

Or Bergans Storen are also dermizax nx

meteomorrisAuthor20 November 2019 · 14:53

I got in touch with the product designers at The North Face (not the marketeers ;)) and these are their answers

@@Storpotatisen: TNF does not publish water clumn ratings but all their FUTURELIGHT products are 100% waterproof under the kinds of extreme conditions they are built for.

@chrashedagain The product designers disagree - Neoshell is so much heavier and the breathability is not good on the ones they have tested. This is why hardly any brands use Neoshell…. IF this was true then more brands would use it…
crashedagainAuthor20 November 2019 · 15:26

Since I posted my analysis, I had the opportunity to test OR Ascentshell. This is another electrospun nano fiber fabric, similar to Futurelight and Neoshell. The test results are very similar. MVTR is 3060, a bit better than Futurelight (2780) and HH 16170, compared to 16416 for Futurelight. So, all of these products have fairly similar results. Compare with Gore Pro: MVTR 2869 and HH of >30000. I would like companies to back up their claims with real numbers and North Face refuses to release their performance data. The consumer should wonder why that is. The selection of a garment should be influenced by expected use and the performance numbers can help guide that decision. Consumers should have that data available to them.

GermainBouvierAuthor24 December 2019 · 17:54

Merci pour l’info.

Never miss a PowderAlert!

Get updates on the latest news, PowderAlerts and more!